【#Patreon讀者分享】睇完網友分享她的深藍男友思想,也想回應一下。
自己也曾經在某網聚中有朋友提到「香港嘅情況不樂觀」,即刻有人回應「背靠祖國點會有事」,「我哋應該為自己係中國人驕傲」等回應。要成為呢類港版小粉紅,具備啲咩條件,等我哋一齊討論一下。
有啲認為自己係好理性嘅老一輩,覺得世界秩序重構係不能避免嘅歷史事實,在呢個時代大洪流,既然係走緊呢個方向就應該持有開放嘅態度,接受呢個世界除咗西方民主體制以外,有另外一個龐大勢力正在崛起,與其對峙。佢哋覺得無需過分解讀,只需隨着個 flow而行,「順其自然」,總之於自己嘅層面無風無浪便當贏。反正已屆花甲,都冇幾多年可以睇,冇眼屎乾淨盲,卻忘記歷世歴代嘅暴政,影響的,是自己的下一代......
⏺全文見Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/posts/55393613
▶️普通法精英想不出來的法律:港區國安法如何令打擊對象「社會性死亡」?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUIIxcHHZyc
同時也有10部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過23萬的網紅Coco哥,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Surfshark VPN:https://surfshark.deals/COCOGOR IB盈透證券:http://bit.ly/cocogorib 新加坡/渣打銀行戶口:[email protected] TransferWise:https://wise.com/invite/u/2...
國安法 幾多 條 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
國安法 幾多 條 在 無神論者的巴別塔 Facebook 的精選貼文
一路睇自殺突擊隊嘅時候,我心入面諗嘅唔係呢套嘢好唔好睇,而係如果如果有條友真係痴到Clone個中國/香港山寨突擊隊的話,究竟條友會犯幾多條《國安法》、會判幾多年監,定係直接啪頭……
(以下含劇透)
====
1. 中國政府捉咗班死囚,然後用屋企人威脅佢地幫手去南海執行任務;南海個政府本來貪污腐敗無能,但國家仍然選擇同佢地合作;
2. 執行任務中班戰狼殺尻哂啲無辜嘅同路人,但吳京完全扮無嘢繼續任務;
3. 跟住幕後大佬原來係中國政府當日搞長征計劃響太空捉番黎嘅,先係響太空船玩尻佢一輪,然後多年來再一直困響南海虐待佢;而家因為怕件事揚出黎,所以先班戰狼殺人滅口;
4. 吳京緊跟政府要求,要將所有證據消滅,包括將隊員殺人滅口;
5. 幕後大佬重獲自由,向人類社會報復,但國家領導人完全無視無辜平民受害,只叫戰狼國家比你嘅任務經已完成,快啲走人;
6. 因為班死囚唔聽話,國家領導人強制人道毀滅班死囚,比見義勇為嘅下屬一嘢扑暈
7. 幕後大佬死前講咗句:「我都只係想享受下自由望下個星空啫……」
8. 完場出完字幕加多場戲,發現吳京訓響醫院未撚死,山寨突擊隊班逃犯下轉拍電視版響央視播出……
國安法 幾多 條 在 Coco哥 Youtube 的最佳貼文
Surfshark VPN:https://surfshark.deals/COCOGOR
IB盈透證券:http://bit.ly/cocogorib
新加坡/渣打銀行戶口:cocogorfds@gmail.com
TransferWise:https://wise.com/invite/u/2c1820
**update**渣打Jersy Island已經無左
走資保平安?2021方法最新update?汇丰閂閘真係無事?反正我信了!
▶ 加入我們的patreon|https://www.patreon.com/cocogor
▶ 加入我們的youtube會員|https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_vZsUCJrwYrbIRPHacAS_Q/join
【如果喜歡這條影片,記得給我Like & 訂閲我的頻道 】
https://www.youtube.com/c/cocogor?sub_confirmation=1
?Instagram|https://www.instagram.com/officialcocogor/
?Facebook|https://www.facebook.com/officialcocogor/
?商務合作|officialcocogor@gmail.com
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄⭐️ 精選影片⭐️ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
?暑假走多10萬人??國安法加速一年✈️其實走左幾多人?
https://youtu.be/YKYjL6qpwRA
?百年爛屋點解最值錢㊙️香港人?大把生意等住你做
https://youtu.be/56nCQEuoKiE
?成千萬買錯爛屋‼️維修費HK$200萬?哭X左
https://youtu.be/gxErQUpsCys
?疫情反彈?人山人海週圍任玩實況??英國限聚令放鬆
https://youtu.be/ds_CRDNo0Gk
國安法 幾多 條 在 Coco哥 Youtube 的最佳貼文
IB盈透證券 http://bit.ly/cocogorib
暑假走多10萬人??國安法加速一年✈️其實走左幾多人?
▶ 加入我們的patreon|https://www.patreon.com/cocogor
▶ 加入我們的youtube會員|https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_vZsUCJrwYrbIRPHacAS_Q/join
【如果喜歡這條影片,記得給我Like & 訂閲我的頻道 】
https://www.youtube.com/c/cocogor?sub_confirmation=1
?Instagram|https://www.instagram.com/officialcocogor/
?Facebook|https://www.facebook.com/officialcocogor/
?商務合作|officialcocogor@gmail.com
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄⭐️ 精選影片⭐️ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
?百年爛屋點解最值錢㊙️香港人?大把生意等住你做
https://youtu.be/56nCQEuoKiE
?成千萬買錯爛屋‼️維修費HK$200萬?哭X左
https://youtu.be/gxErQUpsCys
?疫情反彈?人山人海週圍任玩實況??英國限聚令放鬆
https://youtu.be/ds_CRDNo0Gk
?發現筍盤⁉️差d被?劏到一頸血?英國買樓?
https://youtu.be/AS8QNDK5Rmw
國安法 幾多 條 在 升旗易得道 Youtube 的最讚貼文
【3.8時事!】升旗易得道 2021年3月8日
主持: Tony
3.8 緊急突發【科興又奪一命!】按種科興的71歲男子針後4日在家猝死,還有幾多未被發現?
________________________________________________________
我們的後備頻道【升旗易日報】https://bit.ly/3jW9pr8
“每月贊助”支付方法 !
(1) Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/tuesdayroaddaily
(2) Payme 97114085
(3) 我們英國的paypal户口 : hongkongerscommunity@gmail.com
https://mewe.com/i/tuesdayroadtonyjohnny
https://gab.com/TuesdayRoadWorldwide
https://twitter.com/Tuesdayroad1
升旗易得道【新】支持我們2步曲!!
1. 訂閱 Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/tuesdayroaddaily
2. 俾like, 收看廣告,
【2020年7月1日, 升旗易得道就港區國安法公告 - 】:
因應港區國安法, 本台嚴正作出如下聲明:
1.本台節目於港區國安法生效日起作出全面重組和整合。
2.本台於2020年7月1 日前所作的所有節目均為節目主持或嘉賓之個人意見, 與本台立場無關。
3.本台所有節目之內容均並非在香港特別行政區境內或中華人民共和國之境內製作。
4.本台所有時事節目內容均為引述消息來源、新聞媒體報導 (包括海外媒體, 香港媒體等) 之內容而作出, 與發言者之政治立場或、主張或意見無關。 本台節目內容包含戲仿、滑稽、政治戲仿、諷刺等內容, 與真實之人物並無任何實質關係。
5. 任何接收本台節目內容、收聽的接收者請注意: 本台所有節目內容謹為對新聞時事之評論, 不論在任何時刻均無意構成任何 “煽動、協助、教唆” 行為。 本台節目內容包含戲仿、滑稽、政治戲仿、諷刺等內容, 與真實之人物並無任何實質關係。
6. 最後, 本台據悉港區國安法內容可能帶來極嚴重法律後果, 本台奉勸所有接收本台節目內容、收聽人士小心其條文內容, 切勿以身試法。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
現時, 香港形勢危急, 我們希望各位團結一致, 運用智慧應對。
希望所有支持者能在各方面支援本台繼續擴播。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本台一直致力提供日報式的時事節目予大家。 Youtube 局部恢復了廣告, 但是無理打壓依舊。 廣告收益難以維持本台營運及支援工作。故此, 我們仍然希望聽眾能月費支持本台擴播!
我們經營困難, 因此本台必須改變舊有方式以繼續維持營運。 經商議後, 我們將向聽眾及支持者收取自願性的“每月贊助”。 初步將每月收取贊助港幣200元 (考慮到我們節目集數比同類型網台節目多更多)。 我們致力於降低營運成本,不希望謀取任何暴利, 以達到聽眾及支持者以合理公平的成本即可聽取時事節目。 我們不希望阻止一般大眾繼續收聽節目。 因此, “每月贊助”, 是完全自願性的。我們會在一段時間後檢討計畫內容, 希望各位有能力的, 能盡力支持!
7.21, 8.31, 7.1。 我們, 退無可退。
齊上齊落! 團結一致, 不分割, 不譴責!
我們與前線抗爭者站在一起!
我們認為, 現在是世界歷史的重要關口, 能和近代歷史中的重大變化相比較。 2019年及2020年的事件均顯示出香港人對於民主、自由價值觀的追求, 並同時令這股浪潮捲進全世界, 不可逆轉。
保留實力, 等待黎明!
----------------------------------------------------------
皇牌時事經濟節目!
逢有突發新聞, 立即和大家分析局勢! 關心香港! : 嬉笑怒罵, 分析時事, 經濟, 政治, 歷史和心得!
www.tuesdayroad.com
請即訂閱我們升旗易得道youtube頻道:-
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCC3Ani
===========================================================
國安法 幾多 條 在 國家安全法 - 全國法規資料庫 的相關結果
為確保國家安全,維護社會安定,特制定本法。 第2 條. 任何人不得為外國、大陸地區、香港、澳門、境外敵對勢力或其所設立或實質控制之各類組織、機構、團體或其派遣之 ... ... <看更多>
國安法 幾多 條 在 香港國安法- 維護國家安全 - 政府新聞處 的相關結果
《香港國安法》 · 《中華人民共和國香港特別行政區維護國家安全法》 · 《中華人民共和國香港特別行政區維護國家安全法第四十三條實施細則》 · 關於進行截取及秘密監察的授權 ... ... <看更多>
國安法 幾多 條 在 中華人民共和國香港特別行政區維護國家安全法 - 維基百科 的相關結果
兩條法律分別是由國家和特區層面制定,國家層面要求建立健全法律制度和執行機制,《港區國安法》有實體、程式和組織法三方面的規範,法律內容較《基本法》23條的設想內容 ... ... <看更多>